Brian Pollitt carries the Che banner
The people's revolutionary
by Brian Pollitt
On 9 October 1967, Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara was murdered in the schoolhouse
of the Bolivian village of La Higuera.
He had been captured some 24 hours before. Encircled by U.S.-trained
Bolivian Rangers, he had tried to fight his way out but was rendered
helpless when a bullet disabled his M-2 carbine while another wounded
him in the leg. High-level discussions between the C.I.A. and the Bolivian
military junta in La Paz concluded with the latter’s decision to execute
their prisoner. Sergeant Mario Terán - fortified by alcohol - carried
out the task.
Death was not immediate. Terán had been instructed that Che was officially
to have ‘died of his wounds’ and while his initial burst of gun fire
felled him, it was with multiple wounds to the arms and legs. He was
killed with later shots to the chest.
Martyr of the poor
Representatives of the Bolivian High Command then took a decision they
were later to regret. When captured, Che had been unkempt and emaciated
and in death lay crumpled on a dirt floor. The Junta wished it to be
unmistakeably clear that they had in fact killed the legendary Che Guevara.
His body was therefore flown to the neighbouring town of Vallegrande,
where he was stripped to the waist and cleaned and his hair was washed
and combed.
When put on display to be photographed by the international media, the
corpse - with opened eyes - was thus clearly that of Che Guevara. But
for many the image was also evocative of the figure and sacrifice of
Jesus Christ and in rural Bolivia and more widely, the dead Guevara came
to be seen not as a failed Communist guerrilla leader but as a martyr
in the cause of the poor and oppressed.
In future years he was thus more generally revered than reviled - and
by some even sanctified.
Rumours of Che’s death spread swiftly within Cuba but were sceptically
received.
He had disappeared from public view in 1965 and the international press
had already reported him killed more than once in Africa and in the Dominican
Republic.
Moreover, during Cuba’s revolutionary war, Che had appeared
to have a charmed life, acting with great tactical audacity and causing
his Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro to reprimand him for his total disregard
for his personal safety.
He could be - and was - wounded but otherwise
he seemed indestructible. In one famous incident, when commanding the
guerilla column that besieged and took the key provincial capital of
Santa Clara in December 1958, he had maintained contact with his forces
by casually walking around the city’s main square under the eyes (and
guns) of a contingent of Batista’s troops corralled on, and firing from,
the top floor of the city’s main hotel.
Some days after 9 October, however, in a televised address to the nation,
Castro confirmed Che’s death, showing the photographs of his body as
it had been displayed by the Bolivian military.
The next day the now-iconic Korda photograph, taken in 1960, was published
nationally for the first time as the black-bordered back page of the
newspaper Granma.
Memorial in Havana
A few days later, on the evening of Thursday 18 October, Castro addressed
a Memorial meeting held in Havana’s Revolution Square.
In contrast to official celebrations of important anniversaries of the
Revolution such as the 26 July, no public holiday was declared and those
attending the Memorial Meeting did so after their day’s work. Neither
was any additional public transport laid on which - given Havana’s notoriously
deficient bus service - meant that many would have to walk several miles
to and from the Square.
It was not clear that dark evening just how many attended the Memorial
meeting but those assembled numbered at least 400 thousand. Such an impressive
manifestation of the esteem in which Che was held by the Cuban populace
merited some explanation.
Che had come to Cuba as an unranked member of Castro’s expeditionary
force in December 1956 and became recognized as a national figure only
after the Revolutionary Government took power in January1959. As both
his nickname and accent indicated, he was not Cuban but from Argentina
and both then and now nationalist sentiments in Cuba were palpably strong.
How then was he so rapidly to command an obvious and widespread popular
admiration?
To begin with, it could be noted that Che Guevara was not the only foreigner
to achieve prominence in Cuba’s long struggles for independence, firstly
from Spain and then from the USA. In the 19th century, for example, General
Máximo Gomez - a citizen of the Dominican Republic - had been a key military
and political leader of Cuba’s insurrectionary forces. And, as Castro
was swiftly to make clear after 1959, a powerful strand in Cuban nationalist
thought had always sought not just insular but continental independence.
Personal courage
More important, of course, were particular facets of Che’s character
that exercised a strong appeal for ordinary Cubans. His personal courage
was evidently one of them.
Another was his physical stamina, particularly as this was demonstrated
in unusually taxing circumstances. (That he suffered from crippling asthmatic
attacks was well known).
He was clearly a man of indomitable personal
willpower.
His candour in the public airing of political or administrative problems
- which distinguished him from the generality of political or administrative
leaders - was also much appreciated.
A trivial anecdote serves to make the point: “How can socialism be respected
if all we can make is this kind of rubbish?” he remarked in January 1963,
when trying (in the presence of a visiting foreign delegation) to light
his cigar with the first of several spluttering matches manufactured
by his own Ministry of Industries.
Warming to his theme, he continued by recounting the efforts of fraternal
Czechoslovak chemists to devise a formula adequate for Cuba’s production
of an equivalent to Coca Cola. He deemed the resultant beverage to taste
like “battery acid”.
Plain speaking
His distaste for the diplomatic niceties was displayed on more serious
stages and graver issues when he represented the Cuban government on
a visit to North Africa.
All of Cuba’s modern armaments had been supplied by the USSR free of
charge and, in a widely reported discussion with Egyptian students and
others, he criticized Cuba’s most important ally for requiring other
anti-imperialist Third World countries to pay for Soviet weaponry.
He was censured for this at the highest political level within Cuba but
versions of his tactless conduct were circulated and well-received on
the streets.
Che was also recognized both to be an exceptionally hard worker and one
who rejected the various perks available to those in high office.
When appointed President of the National Bank, his low opinion of monetary
rewards - indeed of money itself - was signalled when Cuba’s newly printed
bank notes appeared bearing his deliberately informal signature - Che.
When acting as Minister of Industries, the lights of his office were
often seen burning late at night. (This was when he wrote most of the
letters and articles that were to be published in nine volumes after
his death). Visitors unfamiliar with his work regime could be disconcerted
to find him presiding over early morning meetings in fatigues rumpled
after a brief night’s sleep on his office couch.
Respect
But one quality above all commanded the respect of ordinary Cubans: Guevara
embodied in signal fashion the unity of words and deeds.
He was a great advocate of the supremacy of moral over material incentives
in Cuba’s socialist development and his theoretical zeal in this sparked
sharp debate in the country’s ideological journals. (For Marx, after
all, the dominant distributive principle in the ‘first stage’ of socialist
development had been a different one, namely: “From each according to
his ability to each according to his work”).
For Che, the most important expression of moral incentives was unpaid
voluntary work, especially in arduous tasks such as the manual cutting
of sugar-cane. And in this, as in everything else he advocated, he matched
his words with his actions, being found in the forefront of every kind
of campaign where voluntary labour was mobilized to cut cane, dig ditches,
work in the docks or shift 325lb bags in the warehouses of the sugar
mills.
New Man
It was widely known that Che envisaged the creation of a ‘New Man’ as
a prerequisite for the development of ‘true’ socialism.
This ‘New Man’ was an austere figure, equally accomplished as a producer
or a warrior, and motivated by a passion to abolish poverty and oppression
and to create, defend and spread socialist society.
What was recognized and respected within Cuba, of course, was that Che
Guevara himself was the embodiment par excellence of all the attributes
of that ‘New Man’. Many also realized that it was an idealistic creation.
Old and young might be encouraged to ‘be like Che’ but few could actually
become like him.
In his address to Cuba’s Memorial meeting of October 1967, Fidel Castro
himself seemed to acknowledge this. He remarked, in his eulogy, that
Che was “a man from another century”.
Icon
In the years following his death, Che was to become an increasingly familiar
figure in a myriad of countries.
Korda’s iconic photograph was reproduced both more and less faithfully
on countless banners, posters, walls and leaflets world-wide, spreading
the legend of Guevara as a romantic, revolutionary hero whose name could
be invoked in the most diverse conditions and for the most diverse causes.
Comparatively few of those embellishing their political actions with
his physical image were well-versed in his writings on the theory and
practice of socialism or on theories of revolutionary warfare. If they
had been, they might have understood more clearly why, on the one hand,
Che had reputable critics who dissented from many of his views, while,
on the other, the French philosopher Jean Paul Sartre could describe
him after his death as “the most complete human being of our age”.
But
in commemorating the 40th anniversary of his death, it seems enough for
the moment to remember Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara as a principled internationalist
revolutionary whose courageous example still inspires multitudes in their
struggles against poverty and oppression.